DOW-UAP-D103
Project Blue Book Photo File Relating to Tremonton Film, Utah, 1952
- Agency
- Department of War
- Format
- Document, 5 pages
- Incident date
- 7/2/52
- Place
- Tremonton, Utah
- Released
- Release 06, September 18, 2026
- Source
- war.gov
Description from war.gov
Page 1
Files 1377 & 1415 July 7, 1952 Tremonton, Utah 2 photos NND 923007Page 2
CPO Delbert C. Newhouse 7 miles north of Tremonton, Utah 1110 MST 2 July 1952 Driving on highway -- Wife noticed objects Group of objects milling about in rough formation No reference points by which to estimate speed, distance or size Size to small on photo to show detail Pod Explanation -- Pillow balloons or Birds PILLOW NND 923007 BALLOONSPage 3
NND 923007 1377Page 4
NND 923007Page 5
General Milis Researeh Laboratories 2010 E. HENNEPIN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS 13, MINN. Photo Laboratory No.. Date --- These we pillow ballins 2' 82. at chihudes and • Olond or covere gave a " saucer uhon 1377 NND 923007The text is machine-read (OCR) from the scan and can contain errors. The scan is the record.
Machine summary
Written by Claude Sonnet 5 (Anthropic) on September 19, 2026, from the record's text and war.gov's description. It is not part of the record and can contain errors; check it against the document.
This document is a Project Blue Book photo analysis file concerning the July 2, 1952 Tremonton, Utah, film taken by Navy Chief Petty Officer Delbert C. Newhouse, who filmed a group of unidentified objects "milling about in rough formation" while driving with his wife seven miles north of town. The file, compiled through December 1952, documents Air Force efforts to determine whether the objects were "pillow balloons" — a weather-related balloon type manufactured solely by General Mills, Inc. at the time. It includes reference photos of pillow balloons supplied by General Mills, correspondence, and notes from a joint review session involving Blue Book staff, balloon specialists, and a General Mills representative.
The record is notable for capturing internal disagreement among investigators: while most reviewers found the footage consistent with balloon behavior, one General Mills representative dissented, noting the objects seemed too bright and maneuvered too fast for balloons. The file also flags an unresolved methodological flaw — angular-velocity estimates relied on the unverified assumption that Newhouse held the camera steady. No pillow-balloon release was ever confirmed near Tremonton, and the file notes seabirds as an alternative explanation, which later Air Force reviews favored. Some annotations are informal, handwritten, and only partially legible.
Most frequent words
Select one to highlight it in the text above.